
I’ve spent most of my career in health insurance, working across both group and individual markets. One thing I’ve seen over and over again is this assumption that “coverage is coverage.” That if you pick a plan at the same metal level, you’re going to get roughly the same experience.
That might feel true on the surface.
It’s not.
And in an ICHRA world, getting this wrong matters a lot more.
--
As ICHRA adoption grows, more employers are moving away from traditional group plans and giving employees the ability to choose their own coverage in the individual market.
On paper, that sounds simple:
But here’s what often gets missed:
The individual market is not the group market.
Plans are structured differently. Networks vary widely. Formularies can be completely different. Even how claims are handled and how accessible care is can change from carrier to carrier.
Two plans that look identical on a spreadsheet can deliver very different real-world experiences.
And most people don’t know how to spot the difference.
In many markets, employees are choosing from dozens of plans. Sometimes more.
More choice sounds empowering — until you’re the one trying to make the decision.
Because the reality is:
Choice without context isn’t empowering. It’s overwhelming.
I’ve watched employees start the process confident and engaged, then hit a wall. They realize how nuanced the differences are, how hard it is to evaluate tradeoffs, and how unclear the consequences of a wrong decision can be.
So what happens?
They default to:
Then six months later, the gaps show up:
This isn’t because people are careless.
It’s because we’ve handed them complexity without guidance.
Choosing the right plan requires context.
You need to understand:
That’s not something most people can — or should — have to piece together on their own.
This is where technology, and more specifically agentic AI, becomes critical.
Decision support should do more than display options. It should interpret them.
It should take real data, individual preferences, and actual usage patterns, and translate that into clear, personalized recommendations.
Not a list.
Not a comparison table.
A recommendation that makes sense for that person.
Most tools today are still static.
They filter.
They sort.
They compare.
But they don’t actually guide.
Agentic AI changes that dynamic.
It acts more like an intelligent layer on top of the data, helping prioritize what matters and ignoring what doesn’t.
It can:
This is the shift from showing options to helping people make decisions.
In a traditional group plan, most of these decisions were made once at the employer level.
In an ICHRA model, every employee is making that decision individually.
That’s a fundamental shift.
ICHRA doesn’t simplify health insurance. It redistributes the complexity.
And without strong decision support, that complexity lands directly on the employee.
ICHRA is reshaping how coverage is delivered. I believe in where it’s going. It creates real opportunity for better alignment between people and their coverage.
But only if we get this part right.
More choice without guidance doesn’t lead to better outcomes. It leads to confusion.
Choice is only empowering if you know how to navigate it. Otherwise, it’s just noise.
The future of this market isn’t just about offering more plans.
It’s about building systems that help people choose the right one with confidence.
Because at the end of the day, health insurance only works if it works for the person who actually has to use it.
And getting that right starts with better decisions.
Kylie Everhart
Chief Commercial Officer @Kyra
Connect
© 2025 Kyra Health. All rights reserved.
Kyra Health is a financial technology company and is not a bank. Kyra Health Visa® Commercial cards are powered by Stripe and issued by Celtic Bank. Kyra Health partners with Stripe Payments Company for money transmission services and account services with funds held at Fifth Third Bank N.A., Member FDIC.